Legal Opinion

Gay v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided July 27, 2010No. 09-370 CPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

ALLEGRA, Judge:

This military pay case is before the court on defendant’s motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction under RCFC 12(b)(1). For the following reasons, the court GRANTS, IN PART, and DENIES, IN PART, defendant’s motion.

I

A brief recitation of the facts provides necessary context.1

Nathaniel Gay (plaintiff) served in the U.S. Marine Corps from July 1, 2002, to June 10, 2003, and in the U.S. Amy from August 31, 2004, to November 19, 2007. He received “a General (Under Honorable Conditions)” discharge from the Army,2 at the rank of pri*684vate first class and a pay grade of E-I. On or…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Karen S. Reynolds v. Army and Air Force Exchange ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
  5. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Prestop Holdings, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  2. Total Engineering, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2015
  3. 120 Delaware Avenue, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2010
  4. Gay v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2014
  5. Stuart v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API