Legal Opinion

United States v. Danielle Pauline Ravitch

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided November 7, 1997No. 96-21002PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Per curiam

Defendant-appellant Danielle Pauline Raviteh appeals the sentence imposed upon her by the district court after she pled guilty to nine counts of fraud and misuse of social security numbers. In sentencing Ravitch, the district court determined that an upward departure was warranted; it is this upward departure that Ravitch now contests. Finding no plain error in either the decision to depart upward or in the extent of the upward departure, we affirm the judgment of conviction and sentence of the district court.

I. FACTUAL & PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

From July to December 1994, defendant-appellant…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Koon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  3. United States v. CalverleyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1994
  4. United States v. RogersCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1997
  5. United States v. Steven BrewerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. United States v. Bruce Carneil Webster, A/K/A B-LoveCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
  2. United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Billy Mel AlfordCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
  4. United States v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2010
  5. United States v. HuertaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API