Legal Opinion
United States v. Rogers
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided October 17, 1997No. 96-31113PublishedCited by 64 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BENAVIDES, Circuit Judge:
Rickey Jerome Rogers appeals his conviction and his sentence for two robberies in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(a). Rogers raises three points of error. He argues that: 1) an in-court identification was admitted in violation of his due process rights; 2) the evidence introduced at trial was insufficient to support his conviction on the first count; and 3) his sentence was based on an erroneous classification of him as a career offender. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm the conviction and remand for re-sentencing.
Background
On August 8,1995, Premier Bank in…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Chapman v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Simmons v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Neil v. BiggersSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by64 opinions
- United States v. Martin Gonzalez MunozCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Posada-RiosCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Kenneth Karl KimlerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- United States v. LeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- Jehan Abdur Raheem, F/k/a John Whitaker v. Walter R. Kelly, Superintendent of Attica Correctional FacilityCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2001
59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.