Legal Opinion

Salasnek Fisheries, Inc. v. Cashner

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 10, 1967No. 650PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrawford, J.

This is an appeal on questions of law from a summary judgment for the defendants, appellees herein. The error assigned is the overruling of plaintiff-appellant’s motion for summary judgment and the sustaining of defendants’ similar motion.

There is no bill of exceptions in the regular sense of the term as required by the Supreme Court. Smith v. Diamond Milk Products, Inc. (1964), 176 Ohio St. 143. However, the parties have stipulated that the decision and judgment of the Court of Common Pleas was based upon the pleadings, affidavits, oral testimony taken at a hearing on the temporary…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Ex Rel. Silz v. HesterbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. Bayside Fish Flour Co. v. GentrySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  3. State v. MartinOhio Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. City of Bowling GreenOhio Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Reynolds v. BuchholzerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  3. Reynolds v. BuchholzerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
  4. State ex rel. Wyoming Game & Fish Commission v. FordyceWyoming Supreme Court · 1972
  5. State v. SwitzerOhio Court of Appeals · 1969

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API