Legal Opinion

Reynolds v. Buchholzer

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided July 1, 1996No. 94-4294PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

87 F.3d 827

Frank REYNOLDS, d/b/a Reynolds Fisheries; Port Clinton Fish

Company; James Maricque, Plaintiffs-Appellants,

v.

Frances S. BUCHHOLZER, Director of Ohio Department of

Natural Resources; Richard B. Pierce, Chief of the Division

of Wildlife; George B. Voinovich, Governor of the State of

Ohio, Defendants-Appellees.

No. 94-4294.

United States Court of Appeals,

Sixth Circuit.

Argued Jan. 29, 1996.

Decided July 1, 1996.

Charles E. Bloom (argued and briefed), Herschel, Accettola, Bloom & Associates, Toledo, OH, Jeffrey C. Zilba (briefed), Zilba & Korpowski, Toledo, OH, for Frank Reynolds, Port Clinton…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Pike v. Bruce Church, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. City of New Orleans v. DukesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. City of Philadelphia v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  5. Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. National Audubon Society, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
  2. Lenscrafters, Inc. v. WadleyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API