Legal Opinion
State v. Martin
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided June 14, 1957No. 2768PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMcClintock, P. J.
This is an appeal on questions of law from a judgment of the Court of Common Pleas. The parties shall be referred to in this opinion as they were designated in the Municipal Court of Canton, to wit, the state of Ohio, plaintiff, and Edward H. Martin, defendant.
Two separate affidavits were filed in the Municipal Court of Canton against the defendant herein by an official of the Ohio Department of Natural Resources, Division of Water, charging the defendant with two violations of Section 1521.05, Revised Code, for the failure to file, within 30 days after the completion of two different water…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- City of Trenton v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Quong Wing v. KirkendallSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Walters v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Heisler v. Thomas Colliery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Matter of City of Syracuse v. GibbsNew York Court of Appeals · 1940
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Salasnek Fisheries, Inc. v. CashnerOhio Court of Appeals · 1967
- State v. Port Clinton Fisheries, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1984