Legal Opinion

State v. Highpine

Montana Supreme Court

Decided December 28, 2000No. 97-004PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Leaphart

¶1 Shawn Ray Highpine (Highpine) appeals from the Eighth Judicial District Court’s denial of his motions to dismiss on a speedy trial issue and to strike the jury panel. The State initially resisted both grounds but later filed a partial concession regarding the motion to strike the jury panel. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

¶2 Highpine raises the following issues on appeal:

¶3 1. Was Highpine denied his right to speedy trial?

¶4 2. Did the District Court err in denying Highpine’s motion to strike the jury panel?

Factual and Procedural Background

¶5 The facts pertinent to this appeal are…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Barker v. WingoSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Doggett v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  3. City of Billings v. BruceMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. LaMereMontana Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. GouldMontana Supreme Court · 1995

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State v. AriegweMontana Supreme Court · 2007
  2. State v. GoodMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State v. LonghornMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  4. State v. AzureMontana Supreme Court · 2002
  5. State v. BlairMontana Supreme Court · 2004

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API