Legal Opinion

United States v. Camacho

District Court, S.D. Florida

Decided October 19, 1994No. 93-352-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

MARCUS, District Judge.

THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the following motions: (1) Defendant Pablo Camacho’s Preliminary Motion for Judgment Notwithstanding the Verdict or, in the Alternative, for New Trial, filed July 1, 1994; and (2) Defendants Andy Watson, Nathaniel Veal, and Charlie Haynes’s Joint Motion for Leave to Interview Members of the Jury, filed July 5, 1994. The first motion seeks the Court’s permission to interview certain members of the jury as to the manner in which they reached a verdict of guilty on a charge of obstruction of justice. The second asks for a…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Tanner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. United States v. DotterweichSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  4. McDonald v. PlessSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
  5. Harris v. RiveraSupreme Court of the United States · 1981

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  2. United States v. FrostCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1997
  3. State v. BaderSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2002
  4. State v. AldretSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1999
  5. Jesse Webster v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API