Legal Opinion

North Canadian River Drainage Dist. No. 3 v. Fleenor

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided June 6, 1916No. 5908PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error from Su/perior Gourt, Oklahoma, County; Edward Dewes Oldfield, Judge. Appeal by F. J. Fleenor from an order of the board of county commissioners of Oklahoma county, entered in passing on his exceptions to the action of viewers appointed to assess damages and benefits from a drainage ditch constructed by the North Canadian River Drainage District No. 3 of Oklahoma County. From a judgment for Fleenor, the drainage district brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.

From an order of the board of county commissioners of Oklahoma county, rendered and entered in passing upon his exceptions to the action of the viewers duly appointed to assess the damages and benefits to his land by the drainage ditch constructed by plaintiffs in error, F. • J. Fleenor, on April 5, 1911, prosecuted his appeal to the district court of Oklahoma county. Later, the issue as to the value of the land taken and the damage to the land not taken were, in- the same court, tried to a jury and passed out of the case, whereupon the cause was transferred to the superior court. Thereafter,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Driver v. DriverIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Beals v. Inhabitants of BrooklineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899
  3. Catron v. Deep Fork Drainage Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Gayman, County Treasurer v. MullenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API