Catron v. Deep Fork Drainage Dist. No. 1
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Error from District Court, Oklahoma County; Geo. W. Clark, Judge. Action by H. S. Catron against the Deep Fork Drainage District No. 1. Judgment for defendant, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtTurner, J.
On December 7, 1908, there was filed in the office of the county clerk of Oklahoma county a petition praying for the establishment of a drainage district, to be known as Deep Fork Drainage District No. 1, and located in Oklahoma county, pursuant to Comp. Laws 1909, secs. 3043 to 3077, inclusive. Thereafter bond was filed and notice given, and the district duly established. Upon the coming in of the report of the viewers, appointed to assess the benefits and damages, exceptions were filed thereto by plaintiff as to the amount assessed against certain lands belonging to him and the damages…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State Ex Rel. v. Cobb, County JudgeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1909
- Hardy v. McKinneyIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Baker v. NewtonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1910
- Conwell v. TateIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bilby v. StewartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- State ex rel. Com'rs of Land Office v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Giles v. LatimerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Brady v. Miami Conservancy DistrictOhio Court of Appeals · 1919
- North Canadian River Drainage Dist. No. 3 v. FleenorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916