Anderson v. Fitness International, LLC
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
GARNETT, J. * —
INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Kirk Anderson appeals from a judgment entered after the trial court granted a motion for summary judgment by defendant Fitness International, LLC, doing business as L.A. Fitness. Anderson contends the trial court erred in striking the allegations in his complaint as to gross negligence, and it erred in granting summary judgment because a triable issue of fact exists as to whether L.A. Fitness was grossly negligent. We affirm.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
A. Anderson’s Injury and Waiver
In December 2011, Anderson, who was in his early 60’s, joined…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
- Rowland v. ChristianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2000
- Nga Li v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1975
- Knight v. JewettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Orange Cnty. Water Dist. v. Sabic Innovative Plastics United States, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2017
- Hass v. Rhodyco Prods., California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Sanchez v. Kern Emergency Medical Transportation Corp.California Court of Appeal · 2017
- Willhide-Michiulis v. Mammoth Mountain Ski Area, LLC, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Bergstrom v. Zions BancorporationCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.