Legal Opinion

Simon v. Mohr

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1929No. 28,447PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This is an action to recover the value of a hedge fence, alleged to be owned in common by plaintiff and defendants and to have been cut down and appropriated by defendants, and to have the hedge fence adjudged to be the boundary line between the land of plaintiff and that of defendants. There was a trial to the court. Extensive findings of fact were made, also conclusions of law, and judgment was rendered for plaintiff. Defendants have appealed.

Briefly, and so far as is here pertinent, the facts found are as follows: The parties claim title…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Edwards v. FlemingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  2. Steinhilber v. HolmesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  3. Kinne v. WaggonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  4. Scott v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1906
  5. George v. GistArizona Supreme Court · 1928

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Spencer v. SupernoisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1954
  2. Bence v. Teddy's TaxiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929
  3. Schlender v. MaretoliSupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Bence v. Teddy's TaxiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API