Legal Opinion

Bridgeford v. U-Haul Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided January 29, 1976No. 40096PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrodkey, J.

This appeal involves a constitutional challenge to section 39-6,193, R. R. S. 1943, formerly designated as section 39-7,135, R. R. S. 1943, which reads as follows: “The owner of any leased truck, truck-tractor, whether with or without trailer, or trailer shall be jointly and severally liable with the lessee and the operator thereof for any injury to or the death of any person or persons, or damage to or the destruction of any property resulting from the operation thereof in this state.”

In his amended petition, plaintiff, Gerald D. Bridge-ford, alleged that on or about January 2, 1973, he was…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Williamson v. Lee Optical of Oklahoma, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1955
  2. West Coast Hotel Co. v. ParrishSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  3. Cameron v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  4. Cramp v. Board of Public Instruction of Orange Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
  5. Cintrone v. Hertz Truck Leasing & Rental ServiceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1965

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Distinctive Printing & Packaging Co. v. CoxNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Kime v. HobbsNebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  3. State v. PetersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
  4. State v. RuzickaNebraska Supreme Court · 1984
  5. Gunn v. BookerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1989

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API