Legal Opinion

Smazal v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 1966PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHallows, J.

The sole issue on this appeal is whether the state failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt the forgery was committed in Marathon county, where the defendant was tried.

The facts are uncontested. The defendant on October 8, 1964, tendered to Carl Karow, the proprietor of an IGA store in the village of Athens, Marathon county, Wisconsin, a check drawn on the Bank of Athens in the sum of $87 payable to one Victor Smart and purportedly signed by Art Heldt. In answer to the proprietor’s question, the defendant identified himself as Victor Smart and said he worked for Art Heldt. The proprietor…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Davis v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Farino v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State v. JacksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1935
  4. Piper v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Kellar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State v. DombrowskiWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
  2. State v. SwinsonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2003
  3. State v. Corey J.G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. WardenburgSupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
  5. State v. ChristophersonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API