State v. Jackson
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtNeeson, J.
The contentions of the defendant which we deem sufficiently important to merit consideration may be summarized as follows:(1) The court erred in overruling his demurrer to the information; (2) the court erred in not requiring the state to elect upon which count it would try the defendant; (3) the court erred in admitting evidence of other sales of *17liquor by the defendant to Dick Bray, the state’s principal witness, at times prior to May 25, 1934; (4) the court erred in stating upon the trial that the venue had been sufficiently proved, and that no further testimony as to venue was necessary,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
- Boldt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
- Dietz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
- Luitze v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
- Faull v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
- State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
- State Ex Rel. La Follette v. RaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
- State v. SpragginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
- Reichhoff v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.