Legal Opinion

State v. Jackson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 24, 1935PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtNeeson, J.

The contentions of the defendant which we deem sufficiently important to merit consideration may be summarized as follows:(1) The court erred in overruling his demurrer to the information; (2) the court erred in not requiring the state to elect upon which count it would try the defendant; (3) the court erred in admitting evidence of other sales of *17liquor by the defendant to Dick Bray, the state’s principal witness, at times prior to May 25, 1934; (4) the court erred in stating upon the trial that the venue had been sufficiently proved, and that no further testimony as to venue was necessary,…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Morey v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1871
  2. Boldt v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Dietz v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Luitze v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1931
  5. Faull v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Whitty v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  2. State v. StevensWisconsin Supreme Court · 1965
  3. State Ex Rel. La Follette v. RaskinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1966
  4. State v. SpragginWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  5. Reichhoff v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API