Legal Opinion

Piper v. State

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 11, 1930PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFowler, J.

The plainfiff in effect alleges as error that: (1) The venue was not proved. (2) The proof does not establish guilt of violation of sec. 359.16, Stats. (3) Sec. 359.16 is unconstitutional. (4) The proof does not establish guilt of any offense. (5) The deceit of the inspector in inducing defendant’s acts renders inadmissible evidence of the transaction with the inspector.

*61(1) While direct proof of venue should be made, absence of it does not defeat conviction where inference of it may properly be drawn from circumstantial evidence. Where no witness testifies directly to the venue, it is…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Topolewski v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Koscak v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1915
  3. Kellar v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Taylor v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. George v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1942
  2. O'BRIEN v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1931
  3. State v. Corey J.G.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1998
  4. State v. HochmanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1957
  5. Hawthorne v. StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API