Legal Opinion

Bismark v. Incorporated Village of Bayville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 10, 1964PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to declare void an amendment (adopted March 29, 1963) to a zoning ordinance of the defendant village, and for other relief, the defendants appeal: (1) from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, dated December 3, 1963, which granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment with respect to the second cause of action, severed the action accordingly, and directed that judgment be entered declaring that the paid purported amendment of March 29, 1963 was void because it was not enacted in compliance with the statute (Village Law, § 179, subd. 1); and (2) from a judgment of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Communist Party of the U. S. A. v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1964
  2. In re "Anonymous"New York City Family Court · 1963
  3. People Ex Rel. Brownell v. Board of AssessorsNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  4. People ex rel. Brownell v. Board of AssessorsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1908

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Siegel v. Kentucky Fried Chicken of Long Island, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  2. Zaubler v. PiconeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. In re the Estate of MurrayNew York Surrogate's Court · 2006
  4. Doe v. KurianskyNew York Supreme Court · 1993
  5. Informal Opinion No., New York Attorney General Reports1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API