Legal Opinion

Hackett v. Foodmaker, Inc.

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 24, 1976No. Docket 23706PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

D. E. Holbrook, Jr., J.

This appeal arises as a result of a jury verdict in the sum of $8,995 in favor of plaintiff and against the defendant for breach of an employment contract.

Defendant moved at the beginning of trial, at the close of plaintiff’s proofs, and again at the termination of defendant’s case, for a directed verdict. Following the verdict defendant moved for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict. All motions were denied by the trial court.

In reviewing the denial of motions for a directed verdict and for a judgment notwithstanding the verdict, this Court is required to view the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Lynas v. Maxwell FarmsMichigan Supreme Court · 1937
  2. Adolph v. Cookware Co. of AmericaMichigan Supreme Court · 1938
  3. McClure v. DukesMichigan Court of Appeals · 1975

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Grouse v. Group Health Plan, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. An-Ti Chai v. Michigan Technological UniversityDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1980
  4. Goff-Hamel v. Obstetricians & Gynecologists, P.C.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Reust v. Alaska Petroleum Contractors, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 2005

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API