Legal Opinion
Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. Murdock
New York Supreme Court
Decided December 10, 1937PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtShientag, J.
This is a proceeding to review me action of the board of standards and appeals in affirming the building commissioner’s denial of petitioners’ application for a curb cut to allow access to their proposed gasoline service station. The petitioner Socony Vacuum Oil Co., Inc., is the owner of premises located at Nos. 102-104 East Thirteenth street and Nos. 127-135 Fourth avenue, in the borough of Manhattan. The petitioner Sobol Bros. Service Stations, Inc., is the lessee of these premises.
On or about June 2, 1936, the petitioners applied to the commissioner of buildings of the city of New York…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- People Ex Rel. Fordham Manor Reformed Church v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
- People Ex Rel. Werner v. WalshNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- People ex rel. Broadway & Ninety-sixth Street Realty Co. v. WalshAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922
- Matter of Baerenklau v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Friedland v. IngersollAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Texaco (Puerto Rico) Inc. v. Secretario de Obras PúblicasSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- Ledogar v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1966
- Texaco (Puerto Rico) Inc. v. Secretary of Public WorksSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1962
- Winkler v. State Liquor AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1957