Legal Opinion

Friedland v. Ingersoll

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided November 6, 1936PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Application for a peremptory order of mandamus requiring defendants to lower the curb in front of certain premises in Brooklyn. Order and order on reargument, granting a peremptory mandamus order, reversed upon the law and the facts, with costs to appellant, and motion granted to the extent of directing that an alternative mandamus order issue, without costs. The letter permit with respect to the use of the premises issued before the curb cut permit was issued must be deemed to constitute the conditions upon which the curb permit issued. If the facts be as the defendants assert, that the plot…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Maxwell v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1961
  2. O'BAR v. Town of Rainbow CitySupreme Court of Alabama · 1959
  3. Socony Vacuum Oil Co. v. MurdockNew York Supreme Court · 1937

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API