Legal Opinion
Hudson & M. R. Co. v. Hardy
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided April 10, 1939No. 189PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CHASE, Circuit Judge.
The plaintiff, Hudson & Manhattan Railroad Company, a corporation organized under the laws of the States of New York and New Jersey, owns and operates an electric railway between cities in those two states. It brought this suit in equity in the Southern District of New York to determine whether it was subject to the provisions of the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C.A. § 151 et seq.,- and to enjoin the defendant Hardy, who was the United States Attorney for the Southern District of. New York, from attempting to enforce the provisions of the Act against it. By leave of the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Mississippi Valley Barge Line Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Shields v. Utah Idaho Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Nashville, Chattanooga & St. Louis Railway v. StateSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Louisiana & Pine Bluff Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
3Cited by5 opinions
- Chicago, S. S. & S. B. R. R. v. FlemingCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- In re Hudson & Manhattan RailroadDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1954
- Public Service Commission v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1943
- Railway Labor Executives' Association and Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers v. Interstate Commerce Commission and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Reed v. Chicago, N. S. & M. R.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1942