Legal Opinion

City of Kansas City v. Dore

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 5, 1907No. 14,737PublishedCited by 16 opinions

Error from Wyandotte court of common pleas; William G. Holt, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Greene, J. :

Edward Dore and his wife, Ellen Dore, recovered a judgment in the court of common pleas of Wyandotte county against the city of Kansas City, Kan., for injuries resulting to them by the death of their minor son, Edward Dore. It was charged that the death was occasioned by the city in negligently maintaining a dangerously deep pond, attractive to boys, adjacent to one of the thoroughfares in the city, and that while playing therein Edward Dore was drowned.

The plaintiff in error had one year after the rendition of the final judgment to…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Andrews v. SwartzSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. Lake Erie & Western Railway Co. v. WatkinsIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Leavenworth Coal Co. v. BarberSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
  4. Toof, McGown & Co. v. CragunSupreme Court of Kansas · 1894

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Norman v. Consolidated Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  2. State v. WatermanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973
  3. Milbourne v. KelleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915
  4. Municipal Airport Condemnation v. WagonerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1947
  5. Kowing v. Douglas County Kaw Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of Kansas · 1949

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API