Legal Opinion

Leavenworth Coal Co. v. Barber

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided July 15, 1891PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Error from, Leavenworth District Court. The opinion states the ease.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Horton, C. J.:

On the 2d day of February, 1889, Allen Barber and Frank Seichpine recovered a judgment against the Leavenworth Coal Company for $65 and costs, taxed at $72.20. The coal company excepted to the judgment, and on February 20, 1889, the case-made was duly settled and signed by Hon. Robert Crozier, judge of the district court of Leavenworth county. On the 20th of March, 1889, the coal company filed a petition in error in this court, and also a praecipe directing the issuance of a summons thereon.

A motion has been submitted by the plaintiffs…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Arnold and Others v. The United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
  2. Louisville v. Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Matthews v. ZaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1822
  4. People ex rel. Campbell v. ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1851
  5. Parkinson v. BrandenburgSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Corpora v. Kansas City Public Service Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1930
  2. Norman v. Consolidated Cement Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1929
  3. State ex rel. Dawson v. SessionsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  4. Fulkerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
  5. Milbourne v. KelleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1915

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API