Legal Opinion
Priast v. Nieman Marcus Group, Inc.
District Court, N.D. California
Decided February 5, 2020No. 3:19-cv-07304Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 7 FELIPE A. PRIAST, Case No. 19-cv-07304-EMC 8 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S 9 v. MOTION TO VACATE ARBITRATION AWARD 10 NEIMAN MARCUS GROUP, INC., Docket No. 1 11 Defendant. 12 13 I. INTRODUCTION 14 Plaintiff is Felipe A. Priast (“Mr. Priast” or “Plaintiff”), is a former employee of 15 Defendant, Nieman Marcus Group, Inc. (“Defendant” or “Neiman Marcus”). Mr. Priast brought 16 claims against Defendant alleging sexual harassment and stereotype discrimination in an 17 arbitration procedure administered by JAMS. He…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Comedy Club, Inc. v. Improv West AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Conntech Development Company v. University of Connecticut Education Properties, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
- United States Life Insurance v. Superior National InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Poweragent Inc., a California Corporation v. Electronic Data Systems Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- Aspic Engineering and Constr. v. Ecc Centcom Constructors LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.