Legal Opinion
Anne Anderson v. Cryovac, Inc., Globe Newspaper Company, Intervenor
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 5, 1986No. 86-1221PublishedCited by 244 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWNES, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal by the Globe Newspaper Company (the Globe), intervenor in a civil law suit brought by certain residents of Woburn, Massachusetts, against Cryo-vac, Inc., and the John J. Riley Co. The suit alleged that the defendants contaminated Woburn’s water supply resulting in serious injury and death to certain individuals. This appeal is not concerned with the merits of the tort action; it is directed to orders the district court made prior to the start of trial denying the Globe access to discovery materials. The district court issued two protective orders that…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Hickman v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Nixon v. Warner Communications, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Procunier v. MartinezSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Southern Pacific Terminal Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by244 opinions
- Center for Auto Safety v. Chrysler Group, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Greg Rushford, the Washington Post Company, Intervenor v. The New Yorker Magazine, Inc., and William Shawn Reneta AdlerCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. AmodeoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1995
- Citizens First National Bank of Princeton v. Cincinnati Insurance Company, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Leucadia, Inc. v. Applied Extrusion Technologies, Inc., Richard I. Burstein, Proposed IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
239 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.