Legal Opinion
In Re GlaxoSmithKline Plc
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided April 18, 2006No. A04-2150PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
713 N.W.2d 48 (2006)
In the Matter of GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC.
No. A04-2150.
Court of Appeals of Minnesota.
April 18, 2006.
Mike Hatch, Attorney General, Michael J. Vanselow, Deputy Attorney General, Paul B. Civello, Assistant Attorney General, St. Paul, MN, for appellant State of Minnesota.
Michael A. Lindsay, Dorsey & Whitney LLP, Minneapolis, MN; and Sara D. Schotland (pro hac vice), Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton, Washington, D.C., for respondent GlaxoSmithKline plc.
William F. Mohrman, Mohrman & Kaardal, Minneapolis, MN, for amicus curiae Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America.
Consid…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Buckley v. ValeoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. Alabama Ex Rel. PattersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Eastern Railroad Presidents Conference v. Noerr Motor Freight, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1961
- United Mine Workers v. PenningtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Southeastern Promotions, Ltd. v. ConradSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- In Re Motor Fuel Temperature Sales Practices LitigationDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2010
- In Re Glaxosmithkline Plc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2007