Legal Opinion

Loeh v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 15, 2006No. 05-1208CPublished

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER GRANTING THE UNITED STATES’ MOTION TO DISMISS

FIRESTONE, Judge.

Pending before the court is the motion to dismiss filed by the United States (“government”), pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). The government contends that the claim of the pro se plaintiff, Robert L. Loeh (“plaintiff’ or “Loeh”), for military retirement pay following his court-martial conviction and punitive discharge from the United States Navy (“Navy”)1 fails for lack of subject matter jurisdiction or, in the alternative, fails to state a claim upon…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. United States v. ReedCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  5. Members of the Peanut Quota Holders Association, Inc., Augustus Garrett, Jerome Paulk, Faye Paulk, and D.U. Pullum v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API