Legal Opinion

In Re Hilliker

District Court, S.D. California

Decided February 11, 1935No. 23797PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JAMES, District Judge.

The debtor herein in August, 1934, filed with the farm conciliation commissioner of Los Angeles county his petition under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act, as amended (11 USCA § 203). He owed debts in excess of $30,000. The only parcel of alleged farm property listed was forty acres of land planted principally to citrus fruits of an alleged value of $15,000, with mortgage encumbrances against it amounting to $18,580. The debtor possessed lots and interests in city lots which were largely encumbered; also an interest in an oil well; also the equipment of a dental office.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In Re McMurrayDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 1934
  2. In Re KnightDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1934
  3. In Re Palma Bros.District Court, D. Nevada · 1934
  4. In re StoreyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1934

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Baxter v. Savings Bank of Utica, NYCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1937
  2. In Re ReichertDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
  3. In Re SchaefferDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1936
  4. In Re VaterDistrict Court, E.D. Kentucky · 1936
  5. Benitez v. Bank of Nova ScotiaCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1942

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API