Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

In Re Vater

District Court, E.D. Kentucky

Decided April 25, 1936No. 7:11-misc-07003PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

FORD, District Judge.

This is a proceeding under section 75 of the Bankruptcy Act as amended (11 U.S.C.A. § 203). This action was initiated by the filing and approval of a petition for composition and extension under section 75 (a-r) of the Bankruptcy Act (11 U.S.C.A. § 203 (a-r). Debtors amended their original petition and asked that they be adjudicated as bankrupts under subsection (s) of section 75 (11 U.S.C.A. § 203 (s). One of the secured creditors, the Bank of Alexandria, has filed a motion to dismiss the proceeding on two grounds, (1) because the act is .unconstitutional, and (2)…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Tennessee Pub. Co. v. American Nat. BankCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1936
  2. Borgelt v. BohneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1935
  3. In Re BorgeltDistrict Court, S.D. Illinois · 1935
  4. In Re ReichertDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1936
  5. In Re HillikerDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1935

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. In Re Victory Const. Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 1981
  2. Matter of HarlandUnited States Bankruptcy Court, D. Nebraska · 1980
  3. Burke v. Mesta MacH. Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1948
  4. In Re ThackerUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Virginia · 1980
  5. Ferrer v. Waterman SS CorporationDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1949

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API