Legal Opinion
Daleo, Inc. v. Edmonds
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided November 8, 1994No. 81344PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LAVENDER, Vice Chief Justice.
The question we must decide is whether Petitioner was hired in Oklahoma so as to qualify for workers’ compensation for an injury that occurred in California. We find that Oklahoma case law will not support such a conclusion.
*545FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Petitioner (Edmonds) and a friend (Smith) went to an office in Chandler, Oklahoma seeking work. They were told there were no jobs available; however, the receptionist suggested 1 they call the California site to see if they were hiring. Smith, who had worked for the owner (Levesey) in California, spoke with Levesey…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gomez v. Federal Stevedoring Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
- Hermetics Switch, Inc. v. SalesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1982
- Foster Wheeler Corporation v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
- Armstrong v. Guy H. James Construction CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1965
- Cherokee Lines, Inc. v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
- Triad Transport, Inc. v. WynneSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2012
- Driver Management, Inc. v. MillerCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1995
- Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995