Legal Opinion

Armstrong v. Guy H. James Construction Company

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided April 27, 1965No. 40807PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

JACKSON, Vice Chief Justice.

This is an original proceeding by claimant, Ruth D. Armstrong, administratrix of the estate of Robert Lee Armstrong, Jr., deceased, to review an order of the State Industrial Court denying her an award under the death benefit provisions of the Workmen’s Compensation Act as against a joint venture composed of Guy H. James Construction Company and J. H. Beckman Construction Company, and its insurance carrier.

Armstrong and his friend, Richard Able, were college students working during their summer vacation on the Wilson Dam project in Russell County, Kansas, when…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. General Electric Company v. FolsomSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
  2. Gomez v. Federal Stevedoring Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1949
  3. Groendyke Transport, Inc. v. GardnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  4. Foster Wheeler Corporation v. BennettSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1960
  5. Williams Brothers Company v. WileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1959

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Ardente v. HoranSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1976
  2. Garrison v. Bechtel Corp.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1995
  3. Cherokee Lines, Inc. v. BaileySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
  4. Pierce v. Foley Bros., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  5. Chapman v. Union Equity Cooperative ExchangeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API