Legal Opinion
The Ansaldo San Giorgio I v. Rheinstrom Brothers Co.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided March 4, 1935No. 521PublishedCited by 101 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Roberts
Three shipments totalling 4266 barrels of cherries in brine were loaded at Italian ports upon the S. S. Ansaldo San Giorgio I, consigned to the respondent at ports in the United States. The cargo arrived in bad condition, due to improper stowage, and the respondent filed a libel to recover damages. Trial in the District Court resulted in an interlocutory decree for the respondent. The cause was referred to a commissioner, who found that the containers and the cherries were in good condition when shipped, 162 barrels had become a total loss, and there was additional damage equivalent to a loss…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Adams Express Company v. CroningerSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Railroad Co. v. LockwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1873
- Hart v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Kansas City Southern Railway Co. v. CarlSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Phœnix Insurance v. Erie & Western Transportation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1886
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by101 opinions
- Henningsen v. Bloomfield Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
- Leather's Best, Inc., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross v. S.S. Mormaclynx, Defendants-Appellants-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1971
- New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad v. NothnagleSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Encyclopaedia Britannica, Inc. v. Ss Hong Kong Producer, Her Engines, Etc., and Universal Marine CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Atlantic Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
96 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.