Legal Opinion
Doe v. Rumsfeld
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 22, 2003No. CIV.A. 03-707EGSPublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SULLIVAN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, members of the active duty and selected National Guardsmen components of the Armed Forces as well as civilian contract employees of the Department of Defense (“DoD”) who have submitted or have been instructed to submit to anthrax vaccinations without their consent pursuant to the Anthrax Vaccine Immunization Program (“AVIP”), commenced this action against the Secretary of Defense (Donald Rumsfeld), the Secretary of Health and Human Services (Tommy Thompson), and the Commissioner of the Food and Drug Administration (Mark McClellan).
Because…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Friends of the Earth, Inc. v. Laidlaw Environmental Services (TOC), Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- City of Los Angeles v. LyonsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Allen v. WrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Rempfer v. SharfsteinCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2009
- John Doe 1 v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2004
- Vance v. RumsfeldCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Doe v. RumsfeldDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2007
- Bates v. DonleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.