Legal Opinion

Nawelo v. Von Hamm-Young Co.

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 30, 1913PublishedCited by 17 opinions

Exceptions from Circuit Court, Eirst Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OP THE COURT BY

ROBERTSON, C. J.

This is an action for damages for personal injury alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff by having been run against by an automobile operated by an employee of the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The defendant brings exceptions seeking to have reviewed certain rulings made by the trial court involving questions as to the sufficiency of the evidence for the plaintiff, the admission and rejection of certain testimony over defendant’s objections and the giving and refusing respectively of certain instructions to the jury.

It…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Vicksburg & Meridian Railroad v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Overholser v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1850
  3. Peirce v. Van DusenCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1897
  4. Parkhill v. Town of BrightonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
  5. El Paso Southwestern Ry. Co. v. W.D. FothTexas Supreme Court · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Gibo v. City and County of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Franco v. FujimotoHawaii Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State v. FeteleeHawaii Supreme Court · 2008
  4. Guanzon v. KalamauHawaii Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Young v. PriceHawaii Supreme Court · 1968

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API