Legal Opinion
Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. Gray
Indiana Supreme Court
Decided April 6, 1897No. 17,966PublishedCited by 22 opinions
From the Wayne Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHoward, J.
The appellee recovered damages in the sum of five thousand dollars for injuries alleged to have been caused by the negligence of appellant.
The first paragraph of the complaint alleges that the appellant was, on May 27, 1895, the owner and operator of a line of railway extending east and west through the city of Winchester, Indiana; that said line is crossed in said city by a line of railway of the Grand Rapids and Indiana Railroad Company, which runs north and south; that just north of the appellant’s line, and west of the Grand Rapids line the appellant maintained a small wooden building…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mott v. . Consumers' Ice CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
- Smith v. Wabash RailroadIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
- Carthage Turnpike Co. v. AndrewsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Chicago & Alton Railroad v. DillonIllinois Supreme Court · 1888
- Boots v. CanineIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. HadleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Steinkuehler v. WempnerIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Lake Shore & Michigan Southern Railway Co. v. TeetersIndiana Supreme Court · 1906
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. ReedIndiana Court of Appeals · 1913
- Indiana State Highway Commission v. VanderburIndiana Court of Appeals · 1982
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.