Legal Opinion

Agostini v. Guttinger

California Supreme Court

Decided July 5, 1899No. S. F. No. 1471PublishedCited by 13 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Alameda County revoking letters testamentary. P. B. Ogden, Judge. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

BRITT, C.

John Rathgeb, a resident of the county of Alameda, died July 26, 1897, leaving a will whereby he appointed Jules J. Agostini, Frank Bernasconi, and Albert Guttinger his executors. The will was duly admitted to probate on August 30, 1897, and letters testamentary were issued to said persons named as executors. On December 7th next following, said Agostini and Bernasconi filed with the court their verified peti*304tion charging that Guttinger has concealed moneys, goods, and chattels belonging to the estate of said testator, and has failed to account to the estate for propertj', both real…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In re BauquierCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Voorhis v. RussellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Deck's Estate v. GherkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1856

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of ClarkCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
  2. State v. ElsenIdaho Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Rassner v. Federal Collateral Society, Inc.Michigan Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Modern Loan Co. v. Police CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1910
  5. Rose v. Dunk-Harbison Co.California Court of Appeal · 1935

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API