Hurst & Co. v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Martin, Presiding Judge,
delivered tlie opinion of the court:
The merchandise now in question is bleached shellac which was ' imported into this- country under the tariff act of 1922. The importers claimed free entry for it, primarily under the enumeration of shellac in paragraph 1604 of the free list, and alternatively under the provisions of paragraph 1584 for resins not specially provided for in the act.
The paragraph first cited reads as follows:
(Free list.)
1604. Lac, crude, seed, button, stick, or shell.
The appraiser reported that the merchandise was not entitled to free entry as shellac…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hartranft v. WiegmannSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
- Smillie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
- United States v. SalomonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Schade & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
- Kaiserbrauerei, Beck & Co. v. J. & P. Baltz Brewing Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1895
3Cited by3 opinions
- Hamfton v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- United States v. Hurst & Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
- United States v. R. R. Rogers Chemical Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1930