Legal Opinion

United States v. R. R. Rogers Chemical Co.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided April 29, 1930No. 3309Published

1Opinion of the CourtGraham, Presiding Judge

The appellee imported on February 3, 1927, at the port of Seattle, Wash., certain goods invoiced and entered as five casks of naphthalene balls. These were claimed by the importer to be free of duty under paragraph 1549 of the Tariff Act of 1922, which is, in part, as follows:

Par. 1549. * * * naphthalene which after the removal of all the water present has a solidifying point less than seventy-nine degrees centigrade, * * *.

The local appraiser appraised the merchandise under paragraph 27 of the same act, as naphthalene, under the following provision of said paragraph:

Par. 27. * * *…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Smillie & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1921
  2. Johnson Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  3. United States v. SalomonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
  4. United States v. Tampa Box Co.Court of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1928
  5. Smillie v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API