Legal Opinion

Stewart v. Pacific Cadeau

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1920No. 15379PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Wahkiakum county, Hewen, J., entered January 15, 1919, upon granting a nonsuit, dismissing an action for specific performance.

1Opinion of the CourtTolman, J.

J. — This is an action to enforce specific performance of an alleged contract for the sale of real estate. From a judgment of dismissal, appellant brings the cause here for review on appeal.

It appears that, on November 29, 1916, the respondents' executed a written option to purchase to one George F. Hanigan, which described the land, named the purchase price, and provided for the payment thereof within sixty days, and, if not so paid, the earnest money should be forfeited to the vendors and all rights thereunder should cease. Hanigan assigned the option to appellant, and pursuant thereto…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Hardinger v. ColumbiaWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Lawson v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Arbogast v. JohnsonWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Knight v. ChamberlainUtah Supreme Court · 1957

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API