Legal Opinion
Hardinger v. Columbia
Washington Supreme Court
Decided September 24, 1908No. 7310PublishedCited by 6 opinions
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Neterer, J., entered September £8, 1907, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial before the court, dismissing on the merits an action for specific performance.
1Opinion of the Court
Pee Curiam.
This was an action to enforce specific performance of the following contract:
“$100.00
Seattle, June 6, 1906.
“Received of C. T. Hardinger, of Seattle, one hundred dollars as earnest money on the purchase of block 5, Cumberland Addition to the city of Seattle, Washington, according to the official plat on file in the auditor’s office in said county of King. Price of said land is $3,800. Terms of sale are $1,£50 cash, to include earnest money. Balance of $£,550 payable as follows: $1,150 to be paid on delivery of deed and abstract, balance in two equal annual payments of $1,-£75 each,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Carstens v. McReavyWashington Supreme Court · 1890
- Armstrong v. OakleyWashington Supreme Court · 1900
- Scully v. BookWashington Supreme Court · 1891
3Cited by6 opinions
- Levy v. YarbroughSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Lee v. EstabrookWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- PEOPLES NAT. BK. OF WASH. v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1950
- Pacific Mutual Life Insurance v. MunsonWashington Supreme Court · 1921
- Lawson v. KingWashington Supreme Court · 1909
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.