Legal Opinion

Univar Corp. v. City of Phoenix

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided April 5, 1979No. 13933PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GORDON, Justice:

This appeal involves the application of a privilege license tax imposed by the appellee, the City of Phoenix (city), upon the predecessor of the appellant taxpayer, Uni-var Corporation (Univar). The Superior Court denied Univar’s motion for summary judgment and granted both the city’s motion for summary judgment and its motion to dismiss certain counts of Univar’s amended complaint. Assuming jurisdiction pursuant to 17A A.R.S., Arizona Rules of Civil Appellate Procedure, rule 19(e), we affirm the rulings of the Superior Court.

Univar is a Delaware corporation in the business of…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Unemployment Compensation Comm'n of Alaska v. AragonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Southern Pacific Company v. Cochise CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Campbell v. ChatwinArizona Supreme Court · 1967
  4. Duncan v. MackArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  5. City of Phoenix v. Arizona Sash, Door & Glass Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1956

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Southwestern Paint & Varnish Co. v. Arizona Department of Environmental QualityArizona Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Arizona Department of Revenue v. DoughertyArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Estate of Bohn v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
  4. Zeigler v. KirschnerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1989
  5. Farmers Investment Co. v. Arizona State Land DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API