Legal Opinion
Zeigler v. Kirschner
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided October 5, 1989No. 1 CA-CV 88-231PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HAIRE, Judge, Retired.
Plaintiffs Zeigler, Jenkins and Vitale filed this action, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, against Leonard Kirschner, director of the Arizona Health Care Cost Containment System (AHCCCS) in his official capacity. Their complaint sought certain declaratory and injunctive relief and restitution pursuant to both 42 U.S.C. § 1983 1 and state law. The director moved to dismiss the complaint pursuant to Rules 12(b)(1) and (6), Arizona Rules of Civil Procedure, for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction and failure to state a claim upon which…
2Cases cited29 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Kentucky v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Edelman v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Galland v. City of ClovisCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
- Arizona Department of Revenue v. DoughertyArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Estate of Bohn v. WaddellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1992
- Casteel v. VaadeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1992
- Alliedsignal, Inc., a Delaware Corporation v. City of PhoenixCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.