Legal Opinion
Grosse v. Friedman
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 3, 1986PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for medical malpractice, the defendant appeals, as limited by his brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Westchester County (Walsh, J.), entered February 28, 1985, as (1) upon the *540plaintiffs renewed motion for leave to amend his complaint to assert a cause of action to recover damages for lack of informed consent, for further discovery limited to that issue, and to vacate the defendant’s demand made pursuant to CPLR 3216 to resume prosecution of the action, granted leave to amend the complaint, directed that the amended complaint be served within…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Vastola v. MaerNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- Vastola v. MaerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
- Krupp v. Aetna Life & Casualty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by7 opinions
- Jolly v. RussellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Smith v. BessenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- Haga v. PykeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Bigay v. GarveyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1997
- Ecker v. L.N. HopkinsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.