Legal Opinion

Franklin v. Bank of Colbert

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided January 16, 1915PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Complaint. Before Judge Beid. Newton superior court. November 12, 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

1. The act of 1912 (Acts 1912, p. 153), relating to notes given for the sale of stock in incorporated companies, being a substantial reproduction of the act of 1897 (Civil Code, §§ 4293, 4294) relating to notes given for the sale of patent rights, is to be similarly construed, and, being thus construed, is controlled by the decisions in the cases of Smith v. Wood, 111 Ga. 221 (36 S. E. 649); Parr v. Erickson, 115 Ga. *52873 (42 S. E. 240); Hunt v. Davenport, 138 Ga. 622 (75 S. E. 644) ; Heard v. National Bank of Wilkes, ante, 48 (84 S. E. 129).

January 16, 1915. Complaint. Before Judge Beid. Newton…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Parr v. EricksonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Smith v. WoodSupreme Court of Georgia · 1900
  3. Heard v. National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915
  4. Hunt v. DavenportSupreme Court of Georgia · 1912

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ferguson v. Bank of DawsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1935
  2. Beckworth v. Bank of ColbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API