Legal Opinion

Hamill v. Watts

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided May 9, 1913No. Gen. No. 18,101PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error to the Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Robert H. Scott, Judge, presiding. Heard in the Branch Appellate. Court at the March term, 1912.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Clark

delivered the opinion of the court.

Judgment was rendered in this case in favor of the plaintiff (defendant in error) and against the defendant (plaintiff in error) on an alleged assignment of wage claims.

The plaintiff’s statement recites that his claim is based on sundry labor claims, being' for money due from the defendant to various persons for work and labor in and about the operation of a coal mine at Mt. Vernon, Illinois; that the defendant was operating the mine under the name of Mt. Vernon Coal Company, and while so operating it became indebted to sundry…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Loverin v. McLaughlinIllinois Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Kadison v. Fortune Bros. Brewing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Reddig v. LooneyAppellate Court of Illinois · 1917
  2. McGovern v. City of ChicagoAppellate Court of Illinois · 1916
  3. State Street Furniture Co. v. Armour & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1931
  4. Stoddard v. Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1915

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API