Legal Opinion

Stoddard v. Illinois Improvement & Ballast Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided December 8, 1915No. Gen. No. 20,972Published

Appeal from Municipal Court of Chicago; the Hon. Henry C. Beitleb, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

The following are the only grounds urged by the defendant for the reversal of the judgment: (1) “The motion made at the close of all the evidence to direct a verdict for the defendant should have been granted.”. (2) “Appellant did not expressly or impliedly covenant and agree with the appellee to remove stone from the demised premises.” (3) “The burden of proof was upon the appellee to establish that the demised premises contained stone suitable for quarrying purposes, and by the exercise of reasonable skill and diligence could…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Kadison v. Fortune Bros. Brewing Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1911
  3. Daughetee v. Ohio Oil Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1909
  4. Hamill v. WattsAppellate Court of Illinois · 1913
  5. Chicago & Western Indiana Railroad v. Chicago & Eastern Illinois RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1913

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API