Legal Opinion

Huckey v. City of Temecula

California Court of Appeal, 5th District

Decided June 28, 2019No. E070213PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFields, J.

*1095I. INTRODUCTION

Plaintiff and appellant, Charles Huckey, sued defendant and respondent, City of Temecula (the City), for injuries he sustained from tripping and falling on a defective city sidewalk. He alleged the sidewalk defect was a dangerous condition of public property. ( Gov. Code, §§ 830 et seq. )1 The trial court granted the city's motion for summary judgment on the ground the sidewalk defect was trivial as a matter of law. The sidewalk was vertically uneven between two concrete panels, and the height differential was 9/16 of *1096an inch, three feet and one foot from the sidewalk's right…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 2001
  2. People v. BolinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2001
  4. People v. JacksonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Kids' Universe v. In2labsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Chandler v. City of Cypress CA4/3California Court of Appeal · 2021
  2. Fajardo v. DaileyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022
  3. Liss v. City of San Diego CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2021
  4. Miller v. Pacific Gas & Electric Co.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  5. Nassman v. Super. Ct.California Court of Appeal · 2026

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API