Legal Opinion

Applied Biological Laboratories, Inc. v. Diomics Corporation

District Court, S.D. California

Decided September 7, 2021No. 3:20-cv-02500Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 APPLIED BIOLOGICAL Case No.: 3:20-CV-2500-AJB-LL LABORATORIES, INC., 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND 13 DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION TO DISMISS 14 DIOMICS CORPORATION, a Delaware 15 corporation; ANTHONY (Doc. No. 8) ZOLEZZI, an individual; and DOES 1- 16 50, inclusive, 17 Defendants. 18 19 20 Before the Court is Defendant Diomics Corporation and Defendant Anthony 21 Zolezzi’s (“Defendant Diomics” and “Defendant Zolezzi”) motion to dismiss, (Doc. No. 22 8), Plaintiff Applied Biological…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Bartlett v. StricklandSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  3. MAI Systems Corp. v. Peak Computer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  4. Smilecare Dental Group v. Delta Dental Plan of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
  5. K.C. Multimedia, Inc. v. Bank of America Technology & Operations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2009

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API