Legal Opinion

Zirn v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 25, 1946PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action to recover damages for alleged libel, defendants appeal from two orders. Resettled order adjourning trial to March 1, 1946, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. The motion was addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court, and it is only in exceptional instances that the exercise of discretion with respect to such matters will be reviewed. In this instance we see no abuse of discretion. Order requiring defendants to serve an amended answer separately stating and numbering their affirmative defenses, modified on the law by striking out the provisions of the ordering…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Fleckenstein v. FriedmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Zirn v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Crane v. New York World Telegram Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1955
  2. Spodek v. StablesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  3. Kriger v. Holland Furnace Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1960
  4. Gandelman v. GandelmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
  5. Meyers v. Huschle Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API