Legal Opinion

Zirn v. Bradley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided January 22, 1945PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In this action for libel plaintiff moved pursuant to rule 109 of the Rules of Civil Practice, as amended September 15, 1944, to strike out the defenses contained in defendants’ answer. One of the orders appealed from, dated November 3, 1944, granted plaintiff’s motion only to the extent of striking out the third defense, which pleaded truth as justification, as a complete defense, but permitted it to remain as a partial defense. The order also permitted defendants to serve an amended answer. The second order appealed from, dated November 6, 1944, denied plaintiff’s motion to modify, correct…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Triggs v. Sun Printing & Publishing Ass'nNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  2. Hamilton v. . EnoNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Klinck v. . ColbyNew York Court of Appeals · 1871
  4. Ashcroft v. . HammondNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Zirn v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1946
  2. Zirn v. BradleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1945
  3. Rupert v. SellersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Swacker v. MoodyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API